Erysipelas
Erysipelas
References
- Recurrent erysipelas--risk factors and clinical presentation — BMC Infectious Diseases (Inghammar M, Rasmussen M, Linder A). BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:270
- Bullous erysipelas: a retrospective study of 26 patients — Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Guberman D, Gilead LT, Zlotogorski A, et al.). J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41(5 Pt 1):733-737
- Compression therapy to prevent recurrent cellulitis of the leg — New England Journal of Medicine (Webb E, Neeman T, Bowden FJ, et al.). N Engl J Med 2020;383(7):630-639
- Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America — Clinical Infectious Diseases (Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al.). Clin Infect Dis 2014;59(2):e10-e52
Clinical Snapshot
Erysipelas is an acute, superficial infection of the upper dermis and lymphatics, most often caused by S. pyogenes, occurring most commonly on the face and lower extremities. It differs from ordinary cellulitis by its raised, sharply demarcated border and prominent lymphatic involvement. Recurrence occurs in up to 30% of cases.[1] Narrow anti-streptococcal therapy is the default; broad MRSA treatment is not routine.
Recognize the Condition

- Abrupt onset of painful, warm, edematous plaque.
- Raised, sharply defined edge rather than the diffuse border of cellulitis.
- Peau d'orange (orange-peel) texture may occur, from dimpling around hair follicles.
- Face and lower extremities are common sites.
- Bullae can complicate more severe disease and may require extended treatment duration.[2]
Risk Factors
- Broken skin and wounds.
- Chronic edema/lymphedema.
- Tinea pedis and interdigital fissures.
- Previous erysipelas/cellulitis.
- Venous disease, obesity, diabetes, or immunosuppression.
Red Flags & Refer
Refer urgently for any of the following:
- Bullous/necrotic change.
- Systemic toxicity.
- Hypotension.
- Rapid progression.
- Severe pain.
- Facial infection with orbital concern.
- An immunocompromised host with significant infection.
- Possible necrotizing fasciitis.
Assessment & Diagnosis
Diagnosis is clinical. Document the sharply defined raised edge, site, systemic symptoms, and portal of entry. Routine culture is usually not possible unless there is an open lesion. Blood cultures are reserved for severe/systemic cases. Evaluate recurrent lower-limb disease for edema and tinea pedis, both correctable risk factors.
Treatment Targets
- Rapidly control streptococcal infection.
- Resolve pain, edema, and systemic symptoms.
- Prevent deeper spread and recurrence.
- Correct portals of entry and chronic edema.
Choose Initial Treatment
Classic mild erysipelas
1st line: penicillin V or amoxicillin, narrow anti-streptococcal therapy.
Severe disease (systemic toxicity, rapid progression, severe pain, oral therapy unsuitable)
1st line (IV): penicillin G or cefazolin, and urgent higher-level assessment.
Beta-lactam allergy
Alternative: clindamycin.
Do not add MRSA-active therapy routinely unless there is a separate reason.
Non-Pharmacologic Treatment
- Elevate the affected limb.
- Use cool compresses for comfort.
- Treat tinea pedis and skin fissures.
- Manage chronic edema with compression once the acute phase permits — daily compression stocking use reduces recurrence.[3]
- Mark margins for objective follow-up.
Pharmacologic Treatment Options
| Drug / intervention | Role | Dose / use | Important adverse effects | Teaching points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin V Preferred | Mild first-line therapy | 300-600 mg PO QID for 5-10 days based on response | GI upset, hypersensitivity | Classic uncomplicated erysipelas where streptococci are strongly suspected. |
| Amoxicillin Preferred | Mild first-line therapy | 500 mg PO TID or 875 mg PO BID | GI upset, hypersensitivity | Alternative narrow streptococcal therapy with more convenient dosing. |
| Cephalexin Alternative | When S. aureus coverage is also desired | 500 mg PO QID | GI upset, hypersensitivity | Use when penicillin is not selected. |
| Clindamycin Alternative | Severe immediate beta-lactam allergy | 300-450 mg PO TID | C. difficile infection risk | Use when local susceptibility supports it. |
| Penicillin G Preferred (parenteral) | Severe erysipelas | 2-4 million units IV Q4-6H | Hypersensitivity, electrolyte load at high doses | For systemic toxicity, rapid progression, or inability to take oral treatment. |
| Cefazolin Alternative (parenteral) | Severe disease, hospital treatment | 1-2 g IV Q8H | Hypersensitivity, phlebitis | When beta-lactam use is appropriate but penicillin G is not selected. |
| Vancomycin Special situation | Severe allergy, nonresponse, or MRSA concern | Institutional weight/AUC-guided IV dosing | Nephrotoxicity, infusion reaction | Reserve for selected severe cases with specialist monitoring. |
Special Populations
Pregnancy
Penicillins and cephalosporins are preferred when the organism is susceptible. Clindamycin can be used for an appropriate severe beta-lactam allergy.
Recurrent lower-limb disease
Prioritize edema control, skin care, and treatment of interdigital fungal disease. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not first-line and should only be considered after recurrent episodes despite correction of modifiable risk factors.
Monitoring & Follow-Up
Review within 48-72 hours. Border expansion should stop, pain and fever should improve, and edema should begin to recede. Bullous change or systemic deterioration requires escalation. Duration can be extended when clinical response is incomplete.
Treatment Failure / Next Step
- Confirm diagnosis and exclude cellulitis mimic.
- Confirm beta-hemolytic streptococcal coverage and adherence.
- Look for an occult abscess or deeper infection if purulence develops.
- Reassess for necrotizing infection if pain/progression is severe.
- Escalate to IV therapy or specialist care when response is inadequate.
Common Errors to Avoid
- Using broad anti-MRSA therapy for classic uncomplicated erysipelas.
- Failing to distinguish a raised sharp border from diffuse cellulitis.
- Ignoring chronic edema and tinea pedis as correctable risk factors.
- Treating severe facial or bullous disease entirely as an outpatient.
Clinical Decision Algorithm
Drug Tables
How to use this table: Doses are adult doses and require patient-specific confirmation (renal/hepatic function, weight, allergy history). Pediatric dosing is weight-based per the current product monograph unless stated. Drug pricing is intentionally omitted. Select any drug name to open its complete Pharmasist Drug Database page.
Oral therapy (mild)
| Drug | Dosage | Adverse effects | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin V | Adults: 300-600 mg PO QID for 5-10 days based on response Children: 25-50 mg/kg/day divided Q6H PO (max 2000 mg/day) | GI upset, hypersensitivity | 1st-line narrow streptococcal therapy. |
| Amoxicillin | Adults: 500 mg PO TID or 875 mg PO BID Children: Weight-based dosing per current product monograph | GI upset, hypersensitivity | Alternative narrow streptococcal therapy. |
| Cephalexin | Adults: 500 mg PO QID Children: 25-50 mg/kg/day divided Q6H PO | GI upset, hypersensitivity | When S. aureus coverage is also desired. |
| Clindamycin | Adults: 300-450 mg PO TID Children over 1 month: 25-40 mg/kg/day divided Q8H PO (max 450 mg/dose) | C. difficile infection risk | Severe beta-lactam allergy. |
Parenteral therapy (severe)
| Drug | Dosage | Adverse effects | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin G | Adults: 2-4 million units IV Q4-6H Children and adolescents: 60,000-100,000 units/kg/dose Q6H IV (max 4 million units/dose) | Hypersensitivity, electrolyte load at high doses | 1st-line for severe/systemic disease. |
| Cefazolin | Adults: 1-2 g IV Q8H Children: 50-100 mg/kg/day divided Q8H IV (max 6000 mg/day) | Hypersensitivity, phlebitis | Hospital alternative to penicillin G. |
| Vancomycin | Adults: 1 g Q12H (or 15 mg/kg Q8-12H) IV, institutional AUC monitoring Children: 45-60 mg/kg/day divided Q6-8H IV | Nephrotoxicity, infusion reaction | Selected severe allergy/nonresponse/MRSA concern. |
Professional reference only. Apply clinical judgment and verify patient-specific decisions against current authoritative guidance and product information.