Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
References
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa — Canadian Dermatology Association. dermatology.ca, Patient Information
- North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: A publication from the United States and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations: Part I: Diagnosis, evaluation, and the use of complementary and procedural management — Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Alikhan A, Sayed C, Alavi A, Alhusayen R, Brassard A, Burkhart C, Crowell K, Eisen DB, Gottlieb AB, Hamzavi I, Hazen PG, Jaleel T, Kimball AB, Kirby J, Lowes MA, Micheletti R, Miller A, Naik HB, Orgill D, Poulin Y). J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;81(1):76-90
- The epidemiology of hidradenitis suppurativa — British Journal of Dermatology (Ingram JR). Br J Dermatol 2020;183(6):990-998
- Comorbidity screening in hidradenitis suppurativa: Evidence-based recommendations from the US and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations — Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Garg A, Malviya N, Strunk A, Wright S, Alavi A, Alhusayen R, Alikhan A, Daveluy SD, Delorme I, Goldfarb N, et al.). J Am Acad Dermatol 2022;86(5):1092-1101
- Review of Comorbidities of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Implications for Daily Clinical Practice — Dermatology and Therapy (Tzellos T, Zouboulis CC). Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2020;10(1):63-71
- Depression and Anxiety in Adults With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis — JAMA Dermatology (Machado MO, Stergiopoulos V, Maes M, Kurdyak PA, Lin PY, Wang LJ, Shyu YC, Firth J). JAMA Dermatol 2019;155(8):939-945
- Hidradenitis suppurativa and squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature — Postepy Dermatologii i Alergologii (Gierek M, Niemiec P, Szyluk K, Ochala-Gierek G, Bergler-Czop B). Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2023;40(3):350-354
- North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: A publication from the United States and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations: Part II: Topical, intralesional, and systemic medical management — Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Alikhan A, Sayed C, Alavi A, Alhusayen R, Brassard A, Burkhart C, Crowell K, Eisen DB, Gottlieb AB, Hamzavi I, Hazen PG, Jaleel T, Kimball AB, Kirby J, Lowes MA, Micheletti R, Miller A, Naik HB, Orgill D, Poulin Y). J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;81(1):91-101
- Combination therapy with clindamycin and rifampicin for hidradenitis suppurativa: a series of 116 consecutive patients — Dermatology (Gener G, Canoui-Poitrine F, Revuz JE, Faye O, Poli F, Gabison G, Pouget F, Viallette C, Wolkenstein P, Bastuji-Garin S). Dermatology 2009;219(2):148-154
- Antiandrogen therapy with spironolactone for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa — Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Golbari NM, Porter ML, Kimball AB). J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;80(1):114-119
- Two Phase 3 Trials of Adalimumab for Hidradenitis Suppurativa — New England Journal of Medicine (Kimball AB, Okun MM, Williams DA, Gottlieb AB, Papp KA, Zouboulis CC, Armstrong AW, Kerdel F, Gold MH, Forman SB, et al.). N Engl J Med 2016;375(5):422-434
- Secukinumab in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (SUNSHINE and SUNRISE): week 16 and week 52 results of two identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials — The Lancet (Kimball AB, Jemec GBE, Alavi A, Reguiai Z, Gottlieb AB, Bechara FG, Paul C, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, et al.). Lancet 2023;401(10378):747-761
- Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (BE HEARD I and BE HEARD II): two 48-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trials — The Lancet (Kimball AB, Jemec GBE, Sayed CJ, Kirby JS, Prens E, Ingram JR, Garg A, Gottlieb AB, et al.). Lancet 2024;403(10443):2504-2519
- Treatment Options For Hidradenitis Suppurativa — Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation. hsfoundation.ca, Patient/Provider Information
Clinical Snapshot
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also called acne inversa, is a chronic inflammatory disease of the hair follicle and its associated structures, occurring in intertriginous, apocrine-gland-bearing skin - most often the axillae, groin, perianal/perineal region, and inframammary folds.[1][2] The disease process begins with follicular occlusion: keratinous debris and sebaceous material plug the follicle, which then ruptures into the surrounding dermis and triggers an intense, self-perpetuating inflammatory response - recruiting neutrophils, then a chronic granulomatous infiltrate, and ultimately driving the abscesses, sinus tracts, and scarring that define the disease.[1][2] This is a genuinely important framing point for pharmacists: despite the name "suppurativa" and the fact that established lesions frequently become secondarily colonized or infected with skin and gut flora, HS is not primarily an infectious disease - it is an inflammatory one. This is exactly why oral antibiotic combination therapy is dosed and continued for its anti-inflammatory rather than purely antimicrobial effect (see Choose Initial Treatment), and why treating every flare as a simple skin infection, with repeated short antibiotic courses and no attention to the underlying inflammatory process, is a common and consequential error (see Common Errors to Avoid).
HS is common enough to matter in routine pharmacy practice but its reported prevalence varies enormously by how it is measured: population-based studies using routinely collected US healthcare data estimate a prevalence around 0.1%, while European studies designed to also capture undiagnosed disease typically estimate 1% or more - a more than 10-fold discrepancy that reflects how often HS goes undiagnosed or misdiagnosed as recurrent boils.[3] The Canadian Dermatology Association estimates that between 300,000 and over 1 million Canadians live with HS.[1] Onset is typically soon after puberty, most often in the teens or twenties, and women are affected roughly 3 times more often than men in North American and European populations (a ratio that is reversed in some other populations, underscoring that HS epidemiology does not generalize perfectly across all groups).[3][1] HS is a chronic, relapsing disease with a substantial, often underappreciated impact on quality of life, driven by chronic pain, malodorous drainage, and a genuinely significant psychosocial burden - see Risk Factors and Complications.
Recognize the Condition

What HS looks like
The hallmark lesions are deep, painful, inflamed nodules and abscesses in the sites listed above, which recur over months to years and progressively evolve into sinus tracts ("tunnels") that intermittently or continuously drain malodorous, purulent or serosanguinous fluid, and eventually into fibrotic scarring, contractures, and open or "double-headed" comedones characteristic of chronically involved skin.[2][1] Lesions are typically painful out of proportion to their size and can meaningfully limit movement - axillary disease can restrict arm mobility, and perianal or inguinal disease can make sitting or walking painful.[1] The disease is chronic and recurrent: a single episode that never returns is not HS.[2]
Hurley staging - directly drives the treatment ladder
The Hurley staging system, first described in 1989, remains the most widely used clinical severity classification and is the framework this chapter's treatment ladder (see Choose Initial Treatment) is built around.[2]
| Hurley stage | Clinical findings | Typical management implication |
|---|---|---|
| Stage I | Abscess formation, single or multiple, without sinus tracts or scarring | Topical/local therapy is often sufficient (see Choose Initial Treatment) |
| Stage II | Recurrent abscesses with sinus tract formation and scarring; single or multiple, widely separated lesions | Oral antibiotic combination therapy, hormonal therapy, and/or targeted procedural management |
| Stage III | Diffuse or near-diffuse involvement, with multiple interconnected sinus tracts and abscesses across the entire affected region | Biologic therapy and/or definitive surgical management |
Hurley stage can differ by anatomic site in the same patient (for example, Stage III axillary disease alongside Stage I groin disease), so stage - and treatment - should be assessed and recorded separately for each affected region rather than assigned once for the whole patient.[2]
Risk Factors
- Female sex - roughly 3 times more common in women than men across North American and European cohorts.[3][1]
- Obesity - one of the 2 strongest, and genuinely modifiable, risk associations in HS; higher body mass index is linked to both HS risk and greater disease severity.[3] This is why weight management is treated as a disease-modifying intervention in this chapter, not generic health advice (see Non-Pharmacologic Management).
- Cigarette smoking - the other strongly and consistently replicated, modifiable risk association; smoking is linked to both HS onset and greater severity.[3] Smoking cessation is likewise treated as disease-modifying, not generic counseling (see Non-Pharmacologic Management).
- Family history - an estimated 1 in 3 patients with HS has an affected first-degree relative, consistent with a genetic contribution to follicular occlusion susceptibility.[1]
- Age and hormonal timing - onset is typically soon after puberty, when androgen-driven sebaceous and apocrine gland activity rises; whether menopause reliably induces remission remains unknown.[3]
A substantial, often underappreciated comorbidity burden
HS is not "just a skin disease" - it carries a comorbidity burden that changes how it should be assessed and followed, and every patient benefits from proactive screening rather than waiting for symptoms to be volunteered.[4]
- Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk - HS is associated with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome, and patients with HS have roughly double the risk of cardiovascular death compared with people without HS, and about 1.5 times the risk compared with patients with psoriasis.[3] This overlaps directly with the obesity and smoking associations above.
- Inflammatory bowel disease and inflammatory arthritis - both are significantly associated with HS, and perianal HS specifically can be difficult to distinguish from fistulizing Crohn disease (see Diagnosis/Differential and Red Flags/Refer).[3][5]
- Depression, anxiety, and suicide risk - a systematic review and meta-analysis found a pooled depression prevalence of 16.9% in patients with HS (odds ratio 1.84 versus comparison groups) and an anxiety prevalence of 4.9%.[6] Separately, completed suicide rates in patients with HS are more than double the rate in controls.[3] This psychosocial burden is frequently driven as much by chronic pain, malodour, and disfigurement as by disease severity on examination, and deserves the same explicit, proactive counseling attention as the physical disease (see Patient Education within Monitoring and Follow-Up).
- Other documented associations include pilonidal sinus disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, and obstructive sleep apnea.[3]
Red Flags & Refer
Complications
Beyond the recurrent nodules and abscesses themselves, long-standing, poorly controlled HS carries real complication risk. Chronic scarring and repeated inflammation can cause lasting functional limitation - restricted arm mobility with axillary disease, or lymphedema and contracture in a chronically involved region.[1] Perianal/perineal HS can develop true fistulous tracts and can be genuinely difficult to distinguish from, or can coexist with, fistulizing Crohn disease.[5] The psychosocial complications introduced in Risk Factors - depression, anxiety, and an elevated suicide rate - are complications of the disease in their own right, not a separate issue, and deserve the same clinical attention as any physical complication.[6][3] Most seriously, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) can arise within chronic HS sinus tracts - a well-described though uncommon complication, reported in roughly 2-5% of long-standing cases in surgical/case series, more common in men, and typically arising after many years (often decades) of poorly controlled disease. Because chronic HS skin is already thickened, scarred, and malodorous, a new malignancy can be masked by the background changes and diagnosed late, which is part of why HS-associated SCC carries a disproportionately poor prognosis once it develops.[7]
Most HS is safely managed with the staged approach in Choose Initial Treatment, but escalate assessment or refer for any of the following:
- Signs of systemic infection or spreading cellulitis beyond the typical localized HS pattern - fever, rapidly spreading warmth/erythema, or systemic toxicity - need urgent evaluation; this is not how routine HS behaves and should not be assumed to be "just a bad flare."
- A rapidly progressive or unusually severe presentation for the patient's known disease pattern.
- Any atypical, indurated, non-healing, or rapidly growing area within long-standing, chronically scarred HS - biopsy to exclude squamous cell carcinoma rather than assuming it is another flare.[7]
- Suicidal ideation or significant psychiatric distress - screen proactively given the documented elevated suicide risk in this population, and have a concrete referral pathway ready.[3]
- GI symptoms suggesting coexisting inflammatory bowel disease in a patient with perianal or perineal HS - refer for gastroenterology assessment rather than assuming all perianal findings are HS alone.[5]
- Inadequate response despite an adequate, adherent trial of first-line therapy at the correct Hurley stage - proceed to Treatment Failure/Next Step rather than repeating the same regimen indefinitely.
Assessment & Diagnosis
Diagnosis is clinical
HS is diagnosed clinically, without a confirmatory laboratory test, using a widely accepted 3-part definition: (1) typical lesions - painful nodules, abscesses, draining sinus tracts, and/or fibrotic scars/comedones; (2) typical topography - the axillae, groin, perianal/perineal region, inframammary folds, or buttocks; and (3) chronicity and recurrence - at least 2 episodes in a 6-month period.[2] All 3 elements should genuinely be present; a single self-limited boil in a typical location is not, on its own, sufficient for a diagnosis of HS.
Differential diagnosis
| Condition | Features that point away from HS |
|---|---|
| Furunculosis/carbunculosis (simple bacterial skin infection) | A single or first-time episode, typically resolves completely with antibiotics/drainage and does not recur in a chronic, site-restricted pattern; no sinus tract formation over time. |
| Infected epidermal (pilar) cyst | A single, well-circumscribed lesion, often with a visible central punctum, rather than multiple recurring lesions across the classic HS distribution. |
| Perianal/cutaneous fistulizing Crohn disease | Associated GI symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, blood per rectum); genuine overlap and co-occurrence with HS is well described, and the 2 can coexist in the same patient - GI referral is appropriate when this distinction is unclear (see Red Flags/Refer).[5] |
| Pilonidal sinus disease | Confined to the sacrococcygeal cleft, generally without the multi-site, recurrent pattern typical of HS, though the 2 conditions are epidemiologically associated and can coexist.[3] |
| Granuloma inguinale, lymphogranuloma venereum, and other sexually transmitted infections presenting with inguinal lesions | Relevant sexual history, ulcerative rather than nodular/tunneling morphology, and response to targeted antimicrobial therapy; consider especially with a new, acute inguinal presentation rather than a chronic, recurrent one. |
Investigations
Most patients need no laboratory or imaging work-up to confirm the diagnosis. Routine bacterial culture of draining lesions is not required for diagnosis or initial management - established HS lesions are frequently colonized with mixed skin and gut flora that do not reflect a true, treatable infection - but culture is reasonable when a superimposed infection or antibiotic resistance is specifically suspected (see Choose Initial Treatment and Treatment Failure/Next Step).[2] Skin biopsy is not routinely needed but should be pursued for a genuinely atypical presentation, to help distinguish HS from fistulizing Crohn disease when the distinction is unclear, or - importantly - for any atypical, indurated, non-healing, or rapidly growing area within long-standing, chronically scarred HS, to exclude squamous cell carcinoma (see Red Flags/Refer).[7] Imaging (ultrasound or MRI) is not routine but can help delineate the extent of sinus tract involvement before surgical planning in complex Stage III disease.[2]
Treatment Targets
- Reduce the frequency, severity, and duration of inflammatory flares - nodules, abscesses, and draining sinus tracts.
- Prevent progression to a more advanced Hurley stage, since Stage III disease is materially harder to control and more often needs definitive surgery.
- Control pain, which is frequently the most disabling day-to-day symptom and does not always track visible lesion count.
- Improve quality of life and address the psychosocial burden of HS directly - not as an afterthought once the skin is controlled.
- Actively address the genuinely modifiable disease-driving factors - smoking and excess weight - as therapeutic goals in their own right, not only general health advice.
- Screen for, and coordinate care around, the comorbidities (metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, depression/anxiety) that meaningfully affect this population's overall health.
Choose Initial Treatment
Hurley Stage I (or mild, localized disease at any stage)
1st line topical clindamycin 1% solution, applied twice daily to affected areas - the best-studied topical option, used at a concentration and duration aimed at its local anti-inflammatory effect on the follicle rather than at eradicating a specific pathogen.[8] Adjunct antiseptic washes (for example chlorhexidine or benzoyl peroxide wash) to affected areas can reduce secondary bacterial colonization alongside topical clindamycin.[8] A brief course of an oral antibiotic (a tetracycline-class agent, or clindamycin monotherapy) may be used for a more inflamed flare, but is not needed as ongoing therapy for genuinely Stage I disease.[8]
Hurley Stage II (or an inadequate response to topical therapy)
1st line oral antibiotic combination therapy: clindamycin 300 mg PO twice daily plus rifampin 300 mg PO twice daily, for 10-12 weeks - this specific combination is supported by the largest body of evidence in HS pharmacotherapy and is used at doses and durations selected for their anti-inflammatory, not purely antimicrobial, effect.[9][8] In a prospective series of 116 consecutive patients, this combination produced at least partial improvement in 82% and complete remission in 47%, with maximal effect typically seen by week 10; diarrhea is the most frequent limiting side effect.[9] Alternative, milder Stage II disease a tetracycline-class agent alone - doxycycline 100 mg PO twice daily, or minocycline - as monotherapy for a defined course.[8] Adjunct or alternative in women, especially with a menstrual-cycle-linked flare pattern hormonal therapy: spironolactone 100-150 mg/day PO (an anti-androgen effect, used off-label for this indication, typically dosed higher than for acne) or a combined oral contraceptive when contraception is also desired or appropriate.[10][8] Adjunct for a persistent, localized lesion targeted procedural management (intralesional corticosteroid for an acutely inflamed nodule, or deroofing of an established sinus tract - see below) alongside medical therapy.[2]
Hurley Stage III, or moderate-to-severe disease inadequately controlled by the above
Preferred, first biologic adalimumab, the only biologic with the deepest and longest trial evidence base in HS and typically the first biologic tried.[11] Its HS-specific dosing regimen is genuinely distinct from adalimumab's dosing in most of its other approved indications: 160 mg SC at week 0, 80 mg SC at week 2, then 40 mg SC every week starting at week 4 and continuing - not the every-other-week maintenance dose used for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis. Confirming a patient (or a transcribing prescriber) is actually using the weekly, not biweekly, maintenance dose is a genuinely important, HS-specific verification point.[11] In the pivotal PIONEER I/II trials, a significantly higher proportion of patients achieved a clinical response at week 12 with weekly adalimumab than with placebo (41.8% vs 26.0% in PIONEER I; 58.9% vs 27.6% in PIONEER II).[11] Alternative biologics secukinumab (an IL-17A inhibitor; 300 mg SC at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, then 300 mg SC every 4 weeks, which may be increased to every 2 weeks for an inadequate response) and bimekizumab (an IL-17A/IL-17F inhibitor, and the newest approved option; 320 mg SC every 2 weeks through week 16, then every 4 weeks thereafter) are both supported by large, more recent phase 3 trial programs and are reasonable alternatives, particularly after an inadequate response to, or intolerance of, adalimumab.[12][13] Special situation infliximab is used off-label in refractory HS, more often in a patient with coexisting fistulizing Crohn disease where a single biologic can address both conditions - initiate and manage under specialist direction.[8]
Surgical management - Stage III, or a persistent localized lesion at any stage
Symptomatic relief only, not curative incision and drainage of an acutely painful, fluctuant abscess provides fast symptom relief but does not address the underlying sinus tract or follicular process - recurrence at or near the same site is expected without more definitive treatment, and this should be explained to the patient at the time, not left as an assumption (see Common Errors to Avoid).[2] More definitive deroofing (unroofing) of an established sinus tract - excising the tract's roof to expose and allow healing of its base - is a lower-morbidity, office-based procedure well suited to a persistent Stage II lesion or a localized area of Stage III disease.[2] Definitive, extensive disease wide local excision, with primary closure, skin grafting, or flap reconstruction as needed, is reserved for extensive or refractory Stage III disease and offers the lowest recurrence rate of any surgical option, at the cost of a larger procedure and longer recovery; coordinate timing with medical therapy (often including a biologic) rather than treating surgery as a stand-alone cure.[2]
Non-Pharmacologic Treatment
Genuinely disease-modifying, not just general health advice
- Smoking cessation - one of the 2 strongest modifiable risk factors for both HS onset and severity; counsel and support cessation with the same priority given to it in other genuinely smoking-driven diseases, not as generic health messaging.[3]
- Weight management - obesity is likewise strongly, and modifiably, associated with both HS risk and severity; even modest, sustained weight loss is a reasonable, evidence-supported therapeutic goal alongside pharmacologic treatment, not a separate lifestyle conversation.[3]
Supportive local measures
- Warm compresses to an acutely inflamed nodule can ease pain and may help a superficial lesion drain spontaneously.
- Loose-fitting, breathable clothing over affected areas reduces friction and sweat retention, both of which can provoke flares.
- Antiseptic washes (chlorhexidine or benzoyl peroxide wash) to affected areas can reduce secondary bacterial colonization as an adjunct to medical therapy.[8]
- Avoid tight or occlusive dressings and harsh mechanical exfoliation over active lesions, which can worsen follicular trauma and inflammation.
Psychosocial support
Given the depression, anxiety, and elevated suicide risk documented in this population (see Risk Factors), proactively ask about mood, coping, and quality-of-life impact rather than waiting for a patient to raise it, and have a concrete pathway ready for referral to mental health support when needed.[6][3] Patient support organizations, including the Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation, can be a valuable adjunct for peer support and practical coping strategies.[14]
Pharmacologic Treatment Options
| Drug / intervention | Role | Dose / use | Important adverse effects | Teaching points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clindamycin 1% (topical solution) Preferred | 1st line, Hurley Stage I or mild/localized disease | Apply twice daily to affected areas | Local irritation, dryness (uncommon) | Used for a local anti-inflammatory effect on the follicle, not simply as a topical antimicrobial. |
| Clindamycin (oral, as part of a combination) Preferred | 1st-line combination therapy, Hurley Stage II | 300 mg PO BID, combined with rifampin, for 10-12 weeks | Diarrhea (most common, dose-limiting), Clostridioides difficile colitis, GI upset | Always paired with rifampin for this indication — never as a stand-alone extended oral course for HS. |
| Rifampin (oral, as part of a combination) Preferred | 1st-line combination therapy, Hurley Stage II | 300 mg PO BID, combined with clindamycin, for 10-12 weeks | Orange discoloration of body fluids, hepatotoxicity, GI upset | Potent CYP3A4/CYP2C9 inducer — review the full medication list (including hormonal contraceptives) for interactions before dispensing. |
| Doxycycline Alternative | Monotherapy alternative, milder Hurley Stage II disease | 100 mg PO BID | GI upset, photosensitivity, esophageal irritation | Reasonable alternative to combination therapy for less extensive Stage II disease; avoid in pregnancy. |
| Spironolactone Alternative | Hormonal therapy, women only, especially cycle-linked flares | 100-150 mg/day PO (off-label for this indication) | Hyperkalemia, menstrual irregularity, breast tenderness, dizziness | Dosed higher in HS than for acne; monitor potassium if used with an ACE inhibitor, ARB, or potassium supplement. |
| Combined oral contraceptive (e.g., ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel) Alternative | Hormonal therapy, women who also desire contraception | 1 tablet daily per product regimen | VTE risk, hypertension, headache, nausea, mood effects | Review VTE risk factors and enzyme-inducing interactions (including rifampin, if co-prescribed) before starting. |
| Adalimumab Preferred | 1st-choice biologic, Hurley Stage III or refractory moderate-severe disease | 160 mg SC week 0, 80 mg SC week 2, then 40 mg SC every week from week 4 | Injection-site reaction, infection risk, rare demyelination/lupus-like reaction, TB/hepatitis B reactivation | HS maintenance dose is weekly — genuinely different from the every-other-week dose used in most of adalimumab's other indications; screen for TB/hepatitis B before starting. |
| Secukinumab Alternative | Alternative biologic, particularly after an inadequate response to adalimumab | 300 mg SC weeks 0,1,2,3,4, then every 4 weeks (may increase to every 2 weeks) | Injection-site reaction, upper respiratory infection, candidiasis, rare inflammatory bowel disease exacerbation | Screen for TB before starting; use with caution in a patient with known inflammatory bowel disease. |
| Bimekizumab Alternative | Alternative biologic, newest approved option | 320 mg SC every 2 weeks through week 16, then every 4 weeks | Injection-site reaction, oral/candidal infection (higher rate than IL-17A-only agents), upper respiratory infection | Screen for TB before starting; ask specifically about oral thrush symptoms given the somewhat higher candidiasis rate with dual IL-17A/F blockade. |
| Infliximab Special situation | Refractory disease, particularly with coexisting fistulizing Crohn disease | Per specialist-directed infusion protocol (off-label for HS) | Infusion reactions, infection risk, TB/hepatitis B reactivation | Specialist-initiated; a reasonable single-agent choice when HS and Crohn disease coexist. |
Special Populations
Pregnancy
Topical and oral clindamycin are generally considered compatible in pregnancy and are reasonable choices when antibiotic therapy is needed. Avoid tetracycline-class agents (doxycycline, minocycline) beyond the first trimester given fetal effects on developing bone and teeth, and avoid spironolactone, given its anti-androgen mechanism and theoretical risk of feminization of a male fetus. Rifampin has been used in pregnancy for other indications when clearly needed, but confirm the risk-benefit balance with the prescriber given limited HS-specific data. Adalimumab has substantial safety experience in pregnancy from its use in inflammatory bowel disease and is a reasonable option when biologic therapy is genuinely needed; data for secukinumab, bimekizumab, and infliximab in pregnancy are more limited - discuss with the treating specialist. Some patients experience a genuine improvement in HS during pregnancy, though the course is not predictable.
Breastfeeding
Topical and oral clindamycin are compatible with breastfeeding. Avoid prolonged tetracycline-class therapy. Spironolactone requires individualized discussion given limited infant safety data at HS doses. Adalimumab is generally considered compatible with breastfeeding given minimal transfer into breast milk.
Adolescents
HS onset soon after puberty means adolescent presentations are not rare; the same clinical diagnostic approach applies. Involve a parent/guardian and, where available, pediatric dermatology in staging and treatment decisions, particularly before starting a biologic or an oral antibiotic combination course, and pay particular attention to the psychosocial impact - HS at this age can meaningfully affect school attendance, activity participation, and self-esteem during a formative period (see Non-Pharmacologic Management).
Obesity and metabolic comorbidity
Given the strength of the obesity association (see Risk Factors), actively support weight management as part of the treatment plan rather than treating it as a separate issue, and consider referral for bariatric surgery assessment in a patient with severe, refractory, obesity-associated Stage III disease and no adequate response to medical therapy, in coordination with their broader care team.[3][4]
Monitoring & Follow-Up
Reassess disease activity at each visit by lesion count, drainage, pain, and functional impact (not appearance alone), and confirm genuine adherence before labelling a regimen a failure - see Treatment Failure/Next Step.[8]
Patient education
- HS is a genuine chronic inflammatory disease, not a hygiene problem - explicitly correct the common and hurtful misconception that HS results from poor hygiene or is contagious; it is neither.[1]
- Set realistic expectations: HS is a relapsing-remitting condition best managed as a long-term program (often combining medical and, eventually, surgical treatment) rather than something cured by a single antibiotic course or a single drainage procedure.
- Explain clearly that incision and drainage relieves an acute abscess but does not address the underlying sinus tract, so recurrence at or near the same site is expected without more definitive treatment.[2]
- Reinforce that smoking cessation and weight management are genuinely disease-modifying interventions, not just general wellness advice, and connect the patient with concrete support for both when there is interest.
- Normalize and proactively ask about the emotional impact of HS - pain, malodour, and visible disease meaningfully affect mood and relationships for many patients, and support is available and worth accessing (see Non-Pharmacologic Management).
Treatment Failure / Next Step
- Confirm the diagnosis and current Hurley stage are both still accurate, and confirm genuine adherence to the current regimen (topical technique, oral antibiotic completion, hormonal therapy timing) before calling it a failure.
- Stage I disease not controlled by topical clindamycin and antiseptic washes after a reasonable trial: add a short oral antibiotic course, or reassess whether the disease has actually progressed to Stage II.[8]
- Stage II disease not controlled by an adequate 10-12 week course of clindamycin plus rifampin (or a tetracycline-class alternative): add hormonal therapy in women with a plausible hormonal pattern, and pursue deroofing for a persistent, localized sinus tract.[8][2]
- Stage II/III disease inadequately controlled by the combination of oral antibiotics, hormonal therapy, and targeted procedures: proceed to biologic therapy, with adalimumab (at its weekly HS-specific dose) as the preferred first agent.[11]
- Inadequate response to, or loss of response to, adalimumab: switch to an alternative biologic (secukinumab or bimekizumab) rather than repeatedly extending or re-trialling the same agent.[12][13]
- Extensive Stage III disease, or a persistent localized area not responding to medical therapy: refer for surgical assessment - deroofing for a discrete area, or wide local excision for extensive, interconnected disease - generally alongside, not instead of, continued medical therapy.[2]
- At any point where GI symptoms raise concern for coexisting Crohn disease, or where a chronic lesion looks atypical, refer appropriately (gastroenterology, or biopsy to exclude squamous cell carcinoma) rather than continuing to escalate HS-directed therapy alone.[5][7]
Common Errors to Avoid
- Treating HS purely as recurrent "boils" or skin infections, with repeated short antibiotic courses aimed at an infection rather than addressing the underlying follicular-occlusion and inflammatory process — this both under-treats the disease and needlessly escalates antibiotic exposure.
- Using clindamycin or another antibiotic as extended HS monotherapy rather than as part of the evidence-based clindamycin-plus-rifampin combination.
- Treating incision and drainage of an abscess as if it were curative, without explaining to the patient that recurrence at the same site is expected without more definitive medical or surgical therapy.
- Dosing adalimumab at the every-other-week schedule used for rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis rather than the weekly maintenance dose specific to HS.
- Treating smoking cessation and weight management as optional lifestyle advice rather than genuinely disease-modifying interventions worth the same counseling priority as any prescribed medication.
- Missing the opportunity to screen for depression, anxiety, and the broader comorbidity burden (metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease) because the visit focused solely on the skin.
- Failing to consider hormonal therapy (spironolactone or a combined oral contraceptive) in a woman with an obvious menstrual-cycle-linked flare pattern.
- Missing a new, atypical, non-healing, or rapidly growing area within long-standing, chronically scarred HS as "just another flare" rather than biopsying to exclude squamous cell carcinoma.
- Delaying biologic escalation in genuinely Stage III disease by repeatedly cycling through further oral antibiotic courses instead of moving to adalimumab or an alternative biologic.
Clinical Decision Algorithm
Drug Tables
How to use this table: doses are adult doses and require patient-specific confirmation, including renal/hepatic adjustment and pregnancy status. Surgical management (incision and drainage, deroofing, wide excision) is covered in Choose Initial Treatment and is not a pharmacotherapy, so it is not repeated here. Select any drug name to open its complete Pharmasist Drug Database page.
Topical Therapy — Hurley Stage I / Mild Disease
First-line for genuinely mild or localized disease; also used as an ongoing adjunct at every stage.
| Drug | Dosage | Adverse effects | Drug interactions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clindamycin 1%, topical solution | Dosing: Apply BID to affected areas | Local irritation, dryness (uncommon) | None clinically significant with topical use | Applied for its local anti-inflammatory effect on the follicle, not simply as a topical antimicrobial. |
| Resorcinol 15%, cream | Dosing: Apply once daily to inflamed nodules | Local irritation, peeling; systemic absorption/toxicity with prolonged large-area use | None significant at recommended topical use | No Pharmasist Drug Database monograph currently exists for this compounded/specialty product; named as text only. |
Oral Antibiotic Therapy — Hurley Stage II (or a more inflamed Stage I flare)
Dosed and continued for an anti-inflammatory, not purely antimicrobial, effect — this is not treatment of a simple skin infection.
| Drug | Dosage | Adverse effects | Drug interactions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clindamycin + rifampin (combination) | Regimen: Combo: Clindamycin 300 mg PO BID + Rifampin 300 mg PO BID Duration: 10-12 weeks | Diarrhea (common, dose-limiting), <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> colitis, orange discoloration of body fluids (rifampin), hepatotoxicity (rifampin) | Rifampin is a potent CYP3A4/CYP2C9 inducer — review the full medication list, especially hormonal contraceptives and warfarin, before dispensing. | The best-evidenced HS oral regimen; maximal effect is typically seen by about week 10. Always prescribed as this specific combination, not either agent alone for this indication. |
| Doxycycline | Dosing: 100 mg PO BID | GI upset, photosensitivity, esophageal irritation | Chelation with antacids, calcium, iron, or dairy reduces absorption | A reasonable monotherapy alternative to the clindamycin/rifampin combination for milder Stage II disease. Avoid in pregnancy. |
Hormonal Therapy — Women, Adjunct or Alternative
Consider specifically for a woman with a menstrual-cycle-linked flare pattern.
| Drug | Dosage | Adverse effects | Drug interactions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spironolactone | Dosing: 100-150 mg/day PO | Hyperkalemia, menstrual irregularity, breast tenderness, dizziness | Hyperkalemia risk with an ACE inhibitor, ARB, potassium-sparing diuretic, or potassium supplement | Used off-label for HS at a higher dose than typically used for acne; monitor serum potassium periodically. |
| Combined oral contraceptive (e.g., ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel) | Dosing: 1 tablet daily per product regimen | VTE risk, hypertension, headache, nausea, mood effects | Reduced contraceptive efficacy with rifampin or other enzyme inducers — review before co-prescribing | Reasonable when the patient also desires contraception; review VTE risk factors before starting. |
Biologic Therapy — Hurley Stage III or Refractory Moderate-Severe Disease
Adalimumab is the preferred first biologic given the depth of its trial evidence base in HS; secukinumab and bimekizumab are reasonable alternatives, particularly after an inadequate response.
| Drug | Dosage | Adverse effects | Drug interactions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Induction: 160 mg SC at week 0, then 80 mg SC at week 2 Maintenance: 40 mg SC every week, starting at week 4 | Injection-site reaction, infection risk, rare demyelinating or lupus-like reaction, TB/hepatitis B reactivation | Avoid live vaccines during treatment; screen for TB and hepatitis B before starting | The HS maintenance dose is weekly — genuinely different from the every-other-week dose used in most of adalimumab's other approved indications. |
| Secukinumab | Induction: 300 mg SC at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 Maintenance: 300 mg SC every 4 weeks (may increase to every 2 weeks for an inadequate response) | Injection-site reaction, upper respiratory infection, candidiasis, rare inflammatory bowel disease exacerbation | Use with caution alongside other immunosuppressants; screen for TB before starting | An IL-17A inhibitor with a large, more recent phase 3 evidence base (SUNSHINE/SUNRISE); use with caution in a patient with known inflammatory bowel disease. |
| Bimekizumab | Dosing: 320 mg SC every 2 weeks through week 16, then every 4 weeks | Injection-site reaction, oral/candidal infection (higher rate than IL-17A-only agents), upper respiratory infection | Use with caution alongside other immunosuppressants; screen for TB before starting | An IL-17A/IL-17F inhibitor and the newest approved HS biologic (BE HEARD I/II); ask specifically about oral thrush given the somewhat higher candidiasis rate with dual IL-17A/F blockade. |
| Infliximab | Dosing: Per specialist-directed infusion protocol | Infusion reactions, infection risk, TB/hepatitis B reactivation | Avoid live vaccines during and after treatment per usual practice | Off-label for HS; specialist-initiated, and a reasonable single-agent choice when HS coexists with fistulizing Crohn disease. |
Professional reference only. Apply clinical judgment and verify patient-specific decisions against current authoritative guidance and product information.